PDA

Ver la versión completa : Los copitos de nieve van tras Linux



SEndero Luminoso
24-09-2018, 02:55 PM
Activists from the feminist and LGBTQIA+ communities have been trying to force the Linux project to join the Contributor Covenant (http://archive.is/sS6YP) since at least 2015. The Contributor Covenant is an agreement to implement a special Code of Conduct (frequently CoC from now on) aimed at changing the predominantly white, straight, and male face of programming. CC’s Code of Conduct is controversial particularly because it allows anyone to be banned from contributing code for any reason, usually with no mechanism for oversight or accountability.On September 16 the pro-CoC side got their wish (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8a104f8b5867c682d994ffa7a74093c54469c11f) (how this happened is a very strange story of its own, read recent news about Linus Torvalds’ departure if you want to know more) — Linux had officially committed to implementing and obeying the CC Code of Conduct — and they immediately set about using it to remove top Linux coders. Sage Sharp (http://archive.is/8fRRu), who describes theyself as a “diversity & inclusion consultant, hufflepuff, non-binary agender trans masculine” and has 7k followers, cites GeekFeminismWiki and targets Google’s Theo Ts’o with accusations of being a rape apologist

https://lulz.com/linux-devs-threaten-killswitch-coc-controversy-1252/

TryXanel
24-09-2018, 03:24 PM
ya hicieron que Linus pidiera disculpas publicamente por la forma de expresarse...

estan todas tomadas por los LGBTQASREJEJADEJE+ las comunidades de programadores yankees... no zafas en ningun lado...



La tipa esa tiene titulo de "Diversity & inclusion consultant" por dio.... que cantidad de humo

Master of the Wind
24-09-2018, 03:44 PM
Bo pero... software libre, el que pinte sube codigo y si rinde se aprueba, si no rinde no, nadie paga por eso ni saca beneficio, que onda con querer figurar ahi?

Freeman
24-09-2018, 10:44 PM
No puedo esperar a que se den cuenta del símbolo de Volvo.

Ryuug4
28-09-2018, 07:56 PM
La "mina" que escribió el código ese tiene un raye importante, entre ésto y la payasada que hicieron en Python removiendo el master/slave, habiendo tantas cosas para hacer...

Esa misma persona había querido hacer hechar a uno de los mayores contribuidores de un proyecto en GitHub porque dijo algo que se interpretó como "transfóbico" en Twitter, totalmente no relacionado al proyecto, cuando en su puta vida aportó algo. Acá está si alguien está al pedo: https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941

Pero éstos SJWs estan pa esa, esas son sus contribuciones.

Vento
13-10-2018, 12:21 AM
nadie paga por eso ni saca beneficio

jha...



Acá está si alguien está al pedo: https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941
Estas cosas pasan desde que se permite que los retrasados mentales accedan a internet y expresen opiniones libremente. A estos así peligrosos hay que volver a aislarlos en instituciones especializadas.

DESCHAIN
13-10-2018, 10:15 AM
La tipa esa tiene titulo de "Diversity & inclusion consultant" por dio.... que cantidad de humo

Relevante:

https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/


Something has gone wrong in the university—especially in certain fields within the humanities. Scholarship based less upon finding truth and more upon attending to social grievances has become firmly established, if not fully dominant, within these fields, and their scholars increasingly bully students, administrators, and other departments into adhering to their worldview. This worldview is not scientific, and it is not rigorous. For many, this problem has been growing increasingly obvious, but strong evidence has been lacking. For this reason, the three of us just spent a year working inside the scholarship we see as an intrinsic part of this problem.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/new-sokal-hoax/572212/


Over the past 12 months, three scholars—James Lindsay, Helen Pluckrose, and Peter Boghossian—wrote 20 fake papers using fashionable jargon to argue for ridiculous conclusions, and tried to get them placed in high-profile journals in fields including gender studies, queer studies, and fat studies. Their success rate was remarkable: By the time they took their experiment public late on Tuesday, seven of their articles had been accepted for publication by ostensibly serious peer-reviewed journals.

TryXanel
13-10-2018, 10:38 PM
jajajaja y pensar que cada vez tratan de meter mas presion con esas giladas... que curso de igualdad de genero, que seminario de inclusion y que la mar en coche...

llega a un punto que te saturan tanto que si tenias una posicion neutral al respecto no te queda otra que oponerte rotundamente a esta tendencia mediocre de mierda

Vento
16-02-2019, 11:36 PM
jajajaja y pensar que cada vez tratan de meter mas presion con esas giladas... que curso de igualdad de genero, que seminario de inclusion y que la mar en coche...

llega a un punto que te saturan tanto que si tenias una posicion neutral al respecto no te queda otra que oponerte rotundamente a esta tendencia mediocre de mierda

amen hermano... (amén I meant....)